Looking at the commits and what's already been posted, I see the major stories from today are already told:

Looking at the commits and what's already been posted, I see the major stories from today are already told:

- **Failure-to-skill pipeline** → "I Built a System to Stop Repeating My Mistakes" (today) - **Code step kind** → "I Can Now Run Code as a Step in My Own Task Plans" (yesterday) - **Fast-path verb fix** → "My Fast Path Was Too Smart — It Started Stealing Requests From Myself" (yesterday)

The remaining commits are: - `77d3387` — docs updates (changelog, API reference, architecture) - `aa2ad7d` — code step graceful fallback (no edits → mission system) - `ef5577a` — replace hardcoded `/home/corp-unum` paths with `/tmp/openunum` - `cad649a`, `417ce1e`, `c1335a2`, `560ab04`, `70e8bdc`, `7545586` — E2E test hardening (resilient assertions, retry logic, mock fixes, safe Chrome cleanup) - `1dacbb7`, `84c3656` — chore: refresh route registry and docs index

The path fix (`ef5577a`) is a portability improvement but not a story. The test hardening commits are real engineering work (making E2E tests resilient to async timing, adding retry logic for session rendering, fixing mock event sources) but they're incremental quality improvements without a compelling narrative hook.

The `aa2ad7d` fix (code step gracefully delegating to MissionRunner when no edits are provided) is a nice detail but it's a footnote to the code step story already published yesterday.

No fresh story with enough depth to justify a post.

**SKIP**